Swami Vivekananda: More Revolutionary than Gandhi and Nehru

Swami Vivekananda was more revolutionary than Gandhi and Nehru, contends OSWALD PEREIRA. The two leaders may be credited in helping to free India from British rule, but it was the revolutionary yogi who was the one first responsible for really awakening the nation to the call for pūrṇa svarājya—complete, unfettered independence—much before Gandhi and Nehru did

In the pantheon of India’s freedom fighters, Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru stand tall as architects of the nation’s eventual liberation from colonial rule. Yet, tucked away in the spiritual pages of India’s history lies a far more radical, even militant voice—Swami Vivekananda.

Without lifting a weapon or launching a mass civil disobedience movement, the saffron-clad monk lit the fire of true freedom in Indian hearts. Not just freedom from the British, but freedom from fear, inferiority, moral apathy and spiritual slumber.

While Gandhi and Nehru, at least in their early political journeys, were content seeking dominion status or home rule within the British Empire’s framework, Vivekananda demanded nothing short of pūrṇa svarājya—complete, unfettered independence. His was not a petitioner’s tone, but a roaring summons. His call was not to negotiate terms with the coloniser, but to awaken the colonised to their own innate divinity and dignity.

If Gandhi was the moral reformer and Nehru the modernist, Vivekananda was the spiritual dynamite. And in the truest sense, a revolutionary—blazing a path not with manifestos or slogans, but with soul-shaking ideas and unflinching courage.

The Monk with a Lion’s Roar

When Swami Vivekananda stood before the Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893, he wasn’t merely representing Hinduism; he was launching India onto the world stage with unshakable self-respect. In a single address, he dismantled centuries of colonial propaganda that painted India as a land of superstition and decay.

But his speeches were more than apologetics for Hinduism. They were radical declarations of spiritual nationalism. “Why is it,” he thundered, “that we, the children of gods and rishis, go about with bowed heads, broken hearts, and crushed spirits?” His words were fire. His gaze, uncompromising. His message: awaken and assert.

Vivekananda wasn’t asking the British for dignity. He was asking Indians to reclaim it. And that was revolutionary. Far more so than Gandhi’s initial appeals for Indian representation within the British constitutional framework, or Nehru’s early Fabian dreams of an Indianised version of the Empire.

Gandhi and Nehru: Gradualists by Design

To be sure, Mahatma Gandhi gave India its moral spine. His campaigns for nonviolent resistance, equality and village-centric self-reliance redefined political struggle. But Gandhi’s early goal was not full independence, but Indian control within the Empire. Even after the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, Gandhi continued to work within constitutional methods for years. It wasn’t until the 1930s that he shifted towards demanding full independence.

Jawaharlal Nehru, too, flirted with socialism and progressivism while largely toeing the line of the British parliamentary model. He admired the Soviet Union’s discipline but kept faith in Western liberal democracy. For all his charisma and intellect, Nehru was shaped by elite institutions—Eton, Harrow, Cambridge—and it showed in his politics. His was the dream of a modern India, not necessarily a free one, at least in the early phases.

Contrast this with Vivekananda, who from the 1890s was already calling for a mental, cultural and spiritual break from colonialism. He didn’t just reject British rule; he rejected the very premise that Indians were subordinates to the West.

He asked his countrymen to stop imitating Europe and start building their own destiny—not in the distant future, but now.

Freedom Beyond Politics

To view Vivekananda purely through a political lens is to miss his true revolution. He wasn’t crafting policy; he was sculpting the Indian soul. In a time when Indians internalised the British view of their inferiority, Vivekananda taught them that they were not weak, but strong. Not lost, but luminous.

“Arise, awake, and stop not till the goal is reached,” he declared—not as a poetic flourish, but as a call to arms, of the nonviolent kind. His was a different militancy. It was the militancy of truth. The militancy of inner power.

This spiritual strength, he believed, was the prerequisite to national independence. What use was political sovereignty if Indians remained mentally shackled?

In this sense, he was decades ahead of Gandhi, who only later began to talk about swaraj as self-rule in the deepest personal sense.

Vivekananda called for atma-shakti—inner power—as the foundation of any meaningful freedom. It was this idea that would later inspire revolutionaries like Subhas Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh and Sri Aurobindo. These men didn’t settle for home rule. They wanted full liberation, in the manner that Vivekananda had first envisioned.

The Unseen Hand Behind the Revolution

Although Vivekananda passed away in 1902, his legacy pulsed through the Indian independence movement. His lectures, writings and conversations had planted seeds in a generation that would rise against the Empire—not merely to demand rights, but to restore India’s pride.

Bose openly acknowledged his debt to Vivekananda, calling him his “spiritual teacher.” Bhagat Singh, though a Marxist by orientation, drew heavily on Vivekananda’s vision of fearlessness and strength. Even Gandhi, though initially wary of Vivekananda’s robust nationalism, came to respect his depth and purity of purpose.

But perhaps the greatest irony is that while Gandhi and Nehru were leading the Congress through diplomatic and constitutional channels, it was Vivekananda’s voice—echoing in ashrams, student halls and freedom fighters’ minds—that was nurturing a deeper revolution.

A Nationalist, Not a Nationalist Politician

Vivekananda never led a political party. He never drafted a resolution or walked in a protest march. And yet, his influence is arguably more profound than many who did. Because he changed the very nature of what it meant to be Indian. He didn’t fight for India’s freedom. He created the desire for it.

He made people believe that freedom was not a favour, but a birthright. Not something to be begged for, but something to be claimed with courage and conviction.

In today’s world of compromises and diluted ideals, Vivekananda remains a blazing reminder that true revolution begins within. That the mightiest uprisings often wear the garb of silence and solitude. That sometimes, a monk with a burning heart can be more militant than an army of agitators.

A Fire That Still Burns

To compare Swami Vivekananda with Gandhi and Nehru is not to diminish the latter, but to elevate the scale of Vivekananda’s contribution. His revolution was not waged on streets, but in spirits. He was not content with political freedom; he wanted total freedom—mental, moral, spiritual.

When the British saw Gandhi, they saw a lawyer-turned-saint. When they saw Nehru, they saw an educated liberal.

But when they looked at Vivekananda, they saw something dangerous: a man who could awaken a sleeping nation with nothing more than a voice—and a vision.

In that sense, Swami Vivekananda was not only more revolutionary than Gandhi and Nehru—he was more foundational. The nation they helped to free was, in many ways, the nation he had already begun to awaken.

And that revolution, kindled in robes of ochre, burns still.

---

Oswald Pereira, a senior journalist, has written ten books, including Beyond Autobiography of a Yogi, The Newsroom Mafia, Chaddi Buddies, The Krishna-Christ Connexion, How to Create Miracles in Our Daily Life and Crime Patrol: The Most Thrilling Stories. Oswald is a disciple of Paramhansa Yogananda, and practises Kriya Yoga.

More Stories by Oswald Pereira

Some images are AI generated