Swami Vivekananda and Subhas Chandra Bose shared a common dream—a free, awakened and ethical India. Their paths diverged—Vivekananda chose inner awakening, Bose militant resistance. Vivekananda ignited the soul-force of Vedanta, Bose embodied its power in rebellious action. OSWALD PEREIRA explores how their visions converge in sanctifying India’s freedom struggle as a moral and spiritual quest
The history of India’s independence movement is marked by a fascinating spectrum of ideological and philosophical approaches to liberation. Among the most compelling intellectual pairings is that of Swami Vivekananda, the spiritual nationalist who redefined Hinduism as a force of inner awakening and national strength, and Subhas Chandra Bose, the revolutionary firebrand who believed that only armed resistance could dismantle the British Empire.
At first glance, these two figures appear to inhabit different moral universes: one a renunciate monk who preached ahimsa (non-violence) and self-realization, the other a political militant who raised the Indian National Army (INA) to fight alongside Axis powers (a coalition of nations during World War II, primarily consisting of Germany, Italy, and Japan).
Yet, Bose unambiguously acknowledged Swami Vivekananda as his spiritual guru and ideological beacon and drew constant inspiration from his writings. Bose remained emotionally and intellectually loyal to Vivekananda’s vision. In a speech delivered on Vivekananda’s birthday in 1940, Bose said, “Swamiji harmonised the East and the West, religion and science, past and present. And that is why he is my ‘guide’.”
How can one reconcile Bose’s embrace of violent struggle with Vivekananda’s nonviolent spirituality? Despite methodological divergences, Vivekananda’s ideals of strength, fearlessness, service, and national regeneration laid the philosophical and cultural foundation for Bose’s revolutionary nationalism. Bose interpreted Vivekananda’s message not as pacifist withdrawal, but as a call to courage, action, and sacrifice.
The central paradox lies in Bose’s embrace of violence and Vivekananda’s adherence to ahimsa. However, Vivekananda’s understanding of nonviolence was not absolute. He once said, “It is the coward who thinks he will die if he kills, and it is the brave man who does not fear to kill.”
While Vivekananda did not endorse political violence, he regarded cowardice as a greater sin than aggression. He advised his followers, especially youth, to develop strength first—physical, mental, and moral.
Bose internalised this call for strength, and took it further. For him, violence was a strategic necessity, not a nihilistic embrace of force. His INA was a disciplined force, and he cautioned against revolutionary terrorism divorced from mass support or ethical discipline.
Rather than being at loggerheads, the philosophies of Vivekananda and Bose can be seen as representing different stages of a revolutionary continuum. Vivekananda prepared the ground by reviving Indian self-respect, cultural confidence, and spiritual activism. Bose built upon that foundation by transforming that spiritual energy into political will and organised resistance.
This view finds support in Bose’s own reflections. In a letter to his brother Sarat Chandra Bose, he wrote: “It is our duty to show by our example that spiritual and political emancipation must go hand in hand…Swami Vivekananda has shown the way.”
Indeed, the Indian freedom struggle witnessed a multitude of voices—some meditative and reformist, others militant and defiant.
Vivekananda’s appreciation of Kshatriya dharma—the duty of the warrior—provided a philosophical bridge to Bose’s militarism. Vivekananda recognized that in a world of injustice, violence could be dharmic if used in defence of truth.
This is echoed in Bose’s worldview, who saw his struggle as aligned with the Bhagavad Gita’s call to action. Like Arjuna, torn between duty and violence, Bose framed his revolution as a moral responsibility. His soldiers often invoked Krishna’s exhortation: “Fight, for the sake of duty, without attachment.”
Vivekananda’s appreciation of Kshatriya dharma—the duty of the warrior—provided a philosophical bridge to Bose’s militarism.
Both Bose and Vivekananda also shared a global vision. Vivekananda dreamed of an India that would teach spiritual wisdom to the world. Bose envisioned India as a sovereign moral leader, free from colonial degradation.
In an age of moral ambiguity, the lives of Swami Vivekananda and Subhas Chandra Bose offer a unique lens to revisit the question of violence and national liberation. Their philosophies, far from being at loggerheads, form a dialectical continuum—from soul-force to sword-force, from renunciation to resistance.
If Bose is the Kshatriya wielding the sword, Vivekananda is the Yogi holding the flame. One without the other would have left the national movement incomplete. Together, they embody the spirit and fire of a revolution that was at once ethical, spiritual, and political.
Swami Vivekananda: Spiritual Strength as National Regeneration
Swami Vivekananda (1863–1902) is often remembered in the West as the charismatic Hindu monk who dazzled audiences at the 1893 Parliament of World’s Religions. But to Indians, he was a national awakener. In his Complete Works, Vivekananda calls for the rejuvenation of India not only through spiritual realization but through political and social service.
While Vivekananda upheld ahimsa as a virtue, he also lamented the emasculation of Hindu society through centuries of foreign subjugation. He believed that fearlessness and manliness were prerequisites for spiritual and national awakening. In his 1897 address in Madras, he thundered: “Strength, strength it is that we want so much in this life, for what we call sin and sorrow have all one cause, and that is our weakness.”
Vivekananda advocated a form of practical Vedanta where spiritual knowledge had to be translated into action and service. This included the establishment of the Ramakrishna Mission, which blended monastic renunciation with social work. For him, the highest form of karma yoga was service to the nation, especially to the poor and downtrodden. His spiritual nationalism offered an alternative to both dogmatic religiosity and passive otherworldliness.
Subhas Chandra Bose: A Revolutionary with Spiritual Roots
Subhas Chandra Bose ((1897–1945), born in Cuttack, came under the influence of Vivekananda’s works as a teenager. In his autobiography The Indian Struggle, Bose describes how Vivekananda’s books “made a deep impression on my mind” and shaped his ideas about nationhood. For Bose, Vivekananda was not merely a religious figure, but a moral force who had reclaimed the soul of India. Bose grew up in a household steeped in Indian philosophy and nationalist politics.
Bose’s break with Mahatma Gandhi’s path of nonviolence was not born out of a rejection of Indian spiritual heritage, but from a different interpretation of it. Bose believed that freedom was a dharma, a sacred duty, and that violent struggle, though tragic, was sometimes ethically necessary. He saw Vivekananda as the spiritual wellspring from which he drew courage, discipline, and a sense of civilizational mission.
Bose’s experiences in British jails, exposure to European fascism, and the urgency of global war convinced him that armed resistance was the only path to freedom.
Yet, despite his political radicalism, Bose did not abandon the spiritual dimension. He wore ochre robes in emulation of monks, believed in karma and rebirth, and invoked Gitaic ethics in motivating soldiers of the INA. He often linked India’s freedom with the idea of dharma—the righteous path.
During his time in Cambridge, Bose wrote to his brother Sarat that reading Vivekananda had taught him to harmonise science with spirituality, and nationalism with service. His admiration went beyond abstraction. He reportedly kept Vivekananda’s photograph in his INA headquarters and invoked his messages in speeches to rally troops.
Vivekananda’s Influence on Bose’s Revolutionary Philosophy
Bose’s revolutionary philosophy reflects key ideas from Vivekananda’s thought:
Fearlessness (Abhaya): Like Vivekananda, Bose believed that fear was the root of subjugation. The INA’s motto “Chalo Dilli” (Onward to Delhi) echoed the urgency and resolve that Vivekananda associated with karmic action.
Kshatriya Dharma: Vivekananda’s reverence for the warrior ethos—particularly in figures like Shivaji—resonated deeply with Bose. He interpreted India’s freedom struggle as a modern battlefield where dharma yuddha (righteous war) had to be waged.
Spiritual Nationalism: Vivekananda taught that India had a unique spiritual destiny. Bose appropriated this message but channeled it through a political framework that emphasised military discipline and sacrifice.
Service (Seva): Both Vivekananda and Bose emphasised service, though in different forms. Vivekananda’s ideal was the ascetic worker; Bose’s was the disciplined soldier. Both viewed selflessness as the moral core of patriotism.
Bose and Ramakrishna: Toward a Broader Spiritual Framework
Though less discussed, Bose also showed appreciation for Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, the guru of Vivekananda. In his letters and reflections, Bose frequently referred to the spiritual unity of religions, a principle central to Ramakrishna’s life. Bose’s secularism was not rooted in Western liberalism, but in the Vedantic pluralism taught by Ramakrishna and Vivekananda.
According to Sugata Bose, Bose’s nephew and biographer, Subhas was spiritually inclined, often reflecting on mystical experience. He was known to meditate regularly, even during military campaigns. In this, he mirrored Vivekananda’s ideal of the householder-yogi or soldier-yogi, integrating the world of action with the world of the spirit.
Bose, Buddhism and Revolutionary Dharma
An underexplored dimension of Bose’s spiritual-political imagination is his engagement with Buddhism. Influenced by both Theravāda and Mahayāna ideals, Bose found in the bodhisattva ethic a model for self-sacrificial action. He admired Ashoka, not only as an imperial ruler but as a figure who internalised compassion as governance.
Bose’s INA included Buddhist soldiers from Burma, Thailand, and Japan. In his addresses, he often referenced dhamma (another term for Dharma, especially among Theravada Buddhists), interpreting it as cosmic order and moral struggle. This emphasis on Buddhist values was not contradictory to his embrace of armed resistance—it reflected a deeper understanding of righteous violence, akin to the Chakravartin (wheel-turning monarch or universal emperor) ideal.
Would Vivekananda Have Supported the INA?
The question is provocative. While it is impossible to provide a definitive answer, historical evidence suggests a nuanced view. Vivekananda died in 1902, decades before the rise of the Axis-aligned INA. Yet, based on his writings, we can infer:
He would likely have disapproved of fascist ideologies, especially Nazism, given his universalism and opposition to racial superiority.
However, Vivekananda may have respected Bose’s sincerity, courage, and moral clarity in opposing colonial rule.
He may have seen Bose’s struggle as a form of karma yoga, if it remained detached from hatred and motivated by service to the nation.
In his letter to Alasinga Perumal, Vivekananda wrote: “Better the active evildoer than the passive good-for-nothing.”
This aphorism speaks volumes. For Vivekananda, moral inaction was the gravest sin, and in this light, Bose’s activism—however violent—may have been spiritually valid if it arose from duty rather than vengeance.
Swami Vivekananda and Subhas Chandra Bose represent two poles of India’s liberation ethos: spiritual renunciation and militant resistance. Far from being at odds, their visions converge in affirming human dignity, fearlessness, and the sacredness of the national mission. If Vivekananda lit the torch of national consciousness, Bose carried it into the battlefield.
Together, they remind us that true patriotism is not merely political, but ethical and spiritual. In an era still grappling with the question of just violence and national identity, their legacy offers a model of courage fused with conscience, and of faith coupled with action.
Swami Vivekananda and Subhas Chandra Bose were bound by a shared vision of a free, awakened, and morally upright India. Their methods differed—contemplation versus confrontation—but their dreams were synchronous.
If Vivekananda offered India the soul-force of Vedanta, Bose gave it the body-force of organised rebellion. One could not have achieved his aim without the other’s contribution.
As India continues to grapple with the challenges of violence, nationalism, and spirituality, this dialogue between Vivekananda and Bose remains a living debate—not of opposition, but of creative synthesis.
Featured Image (AI generated): Swami Vivekananda and Subhas Chandra Bose meditating
Oswald Pereira, a senior journalist, has also written ten books, including Beyond Autobiography of a Yogi, The Newsroom Mafia, Chaddi Buddies, The Krishna-Christ Connexion, How to Create Miracles in Our Daily Life and Crime Patrol: The Most Thrilling Stories. Oswald is a disciple of Paramhansa Yogananda, and practises Kriya Yoga.
More Stories by Oswald Pereira
Some images are AI generated
